NMD-VCell Research Workbench Module: Study design · evidence-to-experiment workflow NMD = neuromuscular disorders
v1.0 candidate Frozen 25 Jul 2026 DOI pending
v1.0.0-database-resource Schema 1.1 Model ridge-safe-v2.3 Benchmark repeated-fold-v2.2 Build EA-20260729-15 v1.0 is a database and evidence-governance release; it is not a validated disease-prediction or clinical decision-support release.
Current evidence ceiling L2 observed HepG2 limited L3a context No independent DMD perturbation validation Open boundary

Stable Study Card 1.5

SC:v1.0.0-database-resource:MON1A:1.5-DRAFTDRAFT

MON1A

muscle perturbation Muscle-context assay

Does perturbing MON1A change one predeclared muscle phenotype in an independent human myogenic model?

Registration completeness38%
Missing before registration
  • direction rationale
  • numeric minimally important effect
  • numeric negligible-effect margin
  • QC thresholds
  • final powered sample size

Study Card visual summary

Frozen evidence and registration route

This multi-panel view turns the frozen Study Card fields into a visual audit of what is known, what is missing and what must be registered next.

BoundaryDescriptive frozen evidence snapshot only; no score, rank, cluster, prediction claim or intervention recommendation is generated.
Registration readiness 38% 5 open fields
Current supported level L2 observed same context perturbation Observed evidence ceiling in this record
Highest assessed context L3a external context screen Assessment does not imply support
Target closure layer L4 DMD functional validation required
DMD source agreement 50% 2/4 sources · conflicted
Muscle expression 8.06 TPM above 1 TPM context flag
a

Frozen evidence route

  1. L1Resource recordHGNC-resolved typed research object
  2. L2Observed HepG2 perturbation94 observed cells
  3. L3aExternal context screenassessed no current hit
  4. L3bIndependent perturbation replicationsame-perturbation replication absent
  5. L4DMD muscle functional validationDMD-relevant functional validation absent
  6. REGRegistered Study Card5 open fields before registration
b

Bioinformatics result snapshot

Legacy integrated DMD priorup
Source agreement50%
Skeletal-muscle TPM8.06
External screenassessed no hit
Dependency cautionnot flagged
DepMap effect-0.111
c

Evidence-to-experiment route

Context

Human myoblast or myotube model; healthy/DMD/isogenic background and differentiation state declared before registration.

Perturb

CRISPRi, CRISPRa or siRNA selected for the biological question; at least two independent reagents where feasible.

Endpoint

One predeclared functional muscle endpoint such as fusion, morphology or contractile readout.

Infer

Independent biological replicate or independently generated perturbation unit; cells within one aggregate are not inferential replicates.

Model

Mixed-effects model with treatment fixed effect and donor/batch/reagent blocking; report reagent-specific estimates.

d

Registration gap map

  • direction rationale
  • numeric minimally important effect
  • numeric negligible-effect margin
  • QC thresholds
  • final powered sample size

These bars are field-state indicators only. They do not create a target score, rank, cluster or prediction claim.

Predeclared design scaffold

Biological context

Human myoblast or myotube model; healthy/DMD/isogenic background and differentiation state declared before registration.

Perturbation modality

CRISPRi, CRISPRa or siRNA selected for the biological question; at least two independent reagents where feasible.

Primary endpoint

One predeclared functional muscle endpoint such as fusion, morphology or contractile readout.

Primary estimand

Between-condition mean difference (or prespecified ratio) in the primary functional endpoint at the frozen time point.

Inferential unit

Independent biological replicate or independently generated perturbation unit; cells within one aggregate are not inferential replicates.

Planning sample size

3–6 independent biological replicates per condition and reagent as a pilot planning range; final n requires assay variance and minimally important effect.

Randomisation unit

Independent culture well or biological replicate, not individual cells.

Statistical model

Mixed-effects model with treatment fixed effect and donor/batch/reagent blocking; report reagent-specific estimates.

Decision-blocking gap

GAP-02 Independent muscle-context perturbation is absent

Highest missing evidence layer

L4 dmd functional validation

GAP-03 DMD-relevant functional validation; GAP-07 independent replication

Perturbation-direction rationale

Current selection: unresolved requires registration

State whether the disease-associated direction is hypothesized as causal, compensatory or accompanying, and preserve the opposite-direction alternative. DMD direction and counteralignment never choose an intervention automatically.

Allowed registered hypotheses: activation; inhibition; bidirectional exploration; direction not identifiable.

Comparator and controls

Secondary endpoints

State-transition extension

Mechanism hypothesis and registered time axis

Scientific object: perturbation × cell state × disease context × time × phenotype

Required before registration: state the proposed early molecular mediator, the expected cell-state transition and the downstream functional consequence.

6–12 hearly molecular or signalling response

planning default requires assay calibration

24–48 hregulatory program and cell-state transition

planning default requires assay calibration

4–7 ddifferentiation and functional phenotype

planning default requires assay calibration

Cell context fields

Required before registration: healthy, DMD or isogenic corrected. Required before registration: proliferating myoblast, early differentiation, fusion or maturing myotube. Required before registration; preserve donor-specific estimates.

Cell–cell consequence

Current status: not assessed. Future levels: conditioned medium; two-cell co-culture; three-dimensional muscle model; spatial perturbation model.

Blocking factors

Assay QC thresholds

Minimally important effect

Required before registration; derive from assay biology or a justified pilot and store the numeric value with units.

Negligible-effect margin

Required before interpreting a null result; store a symmetric or asymmetric numeric margin with units.

Multiplicity and missing data

Primary endpoint across the two reagents; secondary endpoints form a separate multiplicity family.

Define exclusions before unblinding; report all missing units and reasons; do not single-impute primary outcomes without a prespecified sensitivity analysis.

Replication rules

Both reagents must agree in direction and neither may fail the engagement/QC gate; discordance is inconclusive.

Direction must replicate beyond a single donor or isogenic pair before L4 escalation.

Stop rules

Time and cost6–12 weeks after model and reagent readiness; planning estimate only. Institution- and assay-dependent; obtain a local itemised quote before registration.
Preregistration statusdraft requires direction rationale numeric effect margin sample size and qc thresholds
Lifecycle ruleThis draft is editable. Registration requires a timestamp and checksum; a registered revision is immutable and any correction must supersede it.
Escalation ruleEscalate from L2 to L3b only after independent context-matched perturbation replication; L4 requires replicated DMD-relevant muscle evidence.
Evidence transitionCurrent evidence state → predeclared independent test → governed evidence-level review.
Data-release planRelease the frozen card, protocol identifiers, analysis code, complete denominators and results irrespective of direction; never overwrite the registered card.
Boundary: This Study Card is an evidence-gated design scaffold, not a protocol, power calculation, safety claim, prediction or therapeutic recommendation.